Archives for category: Entertainment
King of Cool

King of Cool

In it’s basest explanation, Murphy’s Law states that: anything that can go wrong, will go wrong. Ironically, everything appears to have gone very right for one Edward Regan Murphy.

You’ve heard the narrative: a black ghetto child can’t make it out the ‘hood. Eddie burst out of the hood and took over the Hills. He owned Saturday Night Live and his comedy specials, Delirious and Raw still keep audiences laughing hard, decades later. With a long list of movie classics to his credit, audiences say he’s fallen off because his more recent offerings have been more kiddie fodder than adult frolics.

I’m not going to go into detail about whether he has soared or sunk. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion but one should consider that his kiddie movies have kept the man PAID! However, sticking to character, I digress 🙂

Why have I all of a sudden decided to write about one of the funniest famous people ever (I know non-famous people that are HIGH-larious)? Well, two reasons:

1. I caught the TV special, Eddie Murphy: One Night Only recently on Comedy Central and the tales told, tributes paid plus footage aired brought back memories of his comedic genius and also reminded me that Eddie Murphy is the definition of bad ass!

2. Of late, the unintentional comedy of Lagos ‘big boy and girldom’ has had me fascinated, so this Eddie tribute put ‘big boyism’ in perspective and the wheels started turning…

If you are unfamiliar with Lagos Big Boys and Girls, count yourself lucky (because you don’t have to put up with that BS) or unfortunate (because you’re missing out on some good comedy). Basically, they reckon they are the biggest, baddest and best at everything. They pop bottles in the club for everyone to see but what they hide is the fact they more often than you’d believe pop on credit. It’s a marriage of keeping up with the Joneses and Keeping Up Appearances. Hyacinth Bucket would be very proud.

Anyway, watching stars, past and present, share tales about Eddie (yes, he’s one of those super-duper stars with single name recognition like Michael, Elvis, Madonna, Jack, LeBron), I couldn’t help but think, ‘So called Big Boys and Big Girls, you need to STUDY Eddie Murphy to understand what it really means to be a BIG.’ To paraphrase Jay-Z, “He be the only Big Boy that the Big Boys watch!”

Two stories in particular stood out for me. One by Chris Rock and the other by Keenan Ivory Wayans.

According to Rock, himself, Eddie, Keenan and a bunch of other black guys were out and this white girl came about gushing how Eddie was her favorite, how much she loved him and all that. She really wanted to kiss Eddie and asked if she could, pointing out that she’d never kissed a black man before. As Rock tells it, Eddie responded, “Well, you can’t start at the top baby, you’re gonna have to kiss one of these broke ass niggas.”

The ‘hood’ response to that is, “Like a bawse supposed ta!” A fitting Nigerian response would be, “See levels!”

The Keenan story truly defines what you would expect a Big Boy to be. Boss of all bosses type stuff. The way Keenan put it, night clubs back in the day had a “two brotha minimum” and himself and Eddie were at the door with about 10 other black dudes. The bouncers were like, we know it’s you Eddie but we can only let like four of you in. So Eddie says no problem, instructs four members of the crew to go in and tell every beautiful woman in there that there was a party at Eddie Murphy’s house and in 10 minutes, the club emptied out and everyone headed over to Eddie’s house. About two weeks later, Eddie returned to the club about 20-deep and the ALL GOT IN!

Big Boys and Girls, real or imagined, that’s how the Biggest Boy does it. In the words of Tip Harris, “What you know about that?”

To quote my favorite writer, Bill Simmons, from this fantastic piece about Eddie on his Grantland site, “He was a [Saturday Night Live] cast member at 19, the show’s meal ticket by 20, a movie star by 21, and a full-fledged superduperstar by 22. Tell me when we’ll see that again.”

I honestly can’t tell him – can you?

 

Yes, you just read about Eddie Murphy flossing like it was a serious issue

I Am Random!

man u v rmIn my previous post, I accused the football club I support, Manchester United, of what I then termed robbery, in reference to the purchase of Robin van Persie from bitter rivals, Arsenal Football Club of London.

This post will discuss – hopefully, in brief – another case of alleged robbery involving Manchester United, but this time with the Red Devils on the receiving end.

Last night, March 5th, 2013, Manchester United was defeated by two goals to one at Old Trafford, their home ground, by the visiting Real Madrid team from Spain, thus ending their participation in the UEFA Champions League competition for the 2012/13 season.

The main talking point, which has been widely termed as controversial, was a 56th minute decision by the game referee, Cuynet Cakir of Turkey, to send off Manchester United winger, Nani, for what he deemed a dangerous – reckless, even – tackle on Real’s Alvaro Arbeloa.

(You can view a rather telling gif of the incident here, incase you missed it.)

792102-red-card

Nani sent off to an early shower

Manchester United led the game 1-0 at the time, thereby enjoying a 2-1 aggregate lead over their opponents, and were arguably the better side so far in the contest. The red card changed everything, even though there is no way to ascertain whether the outcome would have been any different if United enjoyed its full compliment of players for the duration of the game. In the link above, you can also view British newspaper headlines printed after the game, with a central theme claiming that United was ‘robbed!’

Before I  proceed, let us remember that I am a Manchester United supporter but like I pointed out in my previous post, I am a football fan first, so I always side with football, regardless. Opinions have been wide spread since the incident, so here I am (a bit after-the-fact, really), jumping into the fray with mine – Luís Carlos Almeida da Cunha was justifiably sent off against Real Madrid yesterday. Just watch that gif again and see for yourself.

However, here’s the rub and where most (read: Man U fans) are coming from. While it may be a justifiable sending off, you don’t send a player off in a crucial game like this! I definitely hear that argument and the Red deep down in me supports this statement (well, I did at the time, actually saying to friends, “Oh, I’m no longer watching, the ref has spoiled the game.”).

But here’s the thing… that position is very unfair to the referee, why? Because asking him alone to realize it is a crucial fixture is absurd! (Yes, I just started consecutive sentences with ‘But’ and ‘Because,’ also separating them in this tangent with the conjunction ‘and’ Apologies to every English teacher I ever had) Nani and the 21 other players on the pitch, as well as the 14 subs, coaching staff and other match officials should be fully aware of this too! You don’t channel the late Bruce Lee when trying to win a ball. WATCH THAT GIF!!! To United fans, it was an AWFUL decision, to neutrals, it was questionable and to United’s detractors, it was FANTASTIC!

However, this is not an absolute condemnation of Nani’s action. You can blame it on the adrenalin rush that we mere individuals cannot completely understand – playing in front of 80,000 screaming fans against one of the biggest clubs in the world, who field the most expensive player on the planet, who just happens to be an ex-teammate and countryman; and you know the world is watching. Also, let’s not forget, Cristiano Ronaldo’s departure from Manchester United was meant to open the door for Nani’s meteoric rise, just like the Portuguese ace’s before him. Instead, he has been reduced to constant fodder for transfer stories. The man must have wanted nothing more than to vanquish his compatriot in front of his home crowd. Nani was amped up for this game but evidently, too amped.

Happier times for Nan and Ron

Happier times for Nan and Ron

Now hecklers, particularly from supporters of clubs not even in the Champions League or in serious contention for any silverware this season, went to town on twitter, BlackBerry, Facebook and so on, ridiculing United like they hadn’t been watching the game. United was ahead, albeit courtesy an unfortunate own goal by Real captain, Sergio Ramos, and ‘bossing’ the game as the Brits would say. Again, this was in no way a guarantee that United would have held on to the lead, let alone win the game. However, on the evidence to that point, after almost an hour and the attempts on goal that repeatedly called Diego Lopez in the Real goal into action towards the end of the encounter, a betting man would put money on United doing the business.

To say the red card didn’t change much is absurd because it directly set off the chain of events that led to the revival by Real Madrid. The foul occurred in the 56th. In the 59th, the ‘assaulted’ Arbeloa, a defender, was replaced by creative midfielder, Luka Modric, whose blinder of an equalizer was scored seven minutes later. Remember, this is Luka Modric who had been repeatedly linked to Manchester United , even before an uneven start to his La Liga career. So I guess he had something to prove and his introduction, super strike and deft touches definitely changed the game. Would he have been introduced if it was11-all? Did the numerical advantage give him more room to operate? We will never know but what we do know is that the sending off was the catalyst for Real’s awakening after a subpar hour on the pitch.

The red card aside, it was a beautiful game with Diego Lopez in goal and Luka Modric standing out for Madrid, while Danny Welbeck worked tirelessly for United. However, my hat goes off to the living legend, Ryan Giggs, wo played in his one thousandth game for Manchester United and showed young’ns how to do this son! At 39 (old in most sporting circles), his performance yesterday (and in most of the 999 appearances that came before) is the type of example young hopefuls need to study and aspire to. It’s a shame his millennial game ended the way it did but that’s just life.

Reliable Ryan

Maybe most interesting was Mourinho conceding (honestly or just mind games, who knows?) that the “best team lost.” However, this debate may go on for days or it may end today (if it hasn’t already) but the bottom line is the final score and on the night, it was Manchester United 1 Real Madrid 2 for an aggregate 2-3 score in favor of the once galácticos. Manchester United, unfairly or otherwise, lost a player (to a red card) and lost the match. End of story.

Mourinho: Apologetic or appreciative?

So, in parting, I will say Manchester United was robbed of a chance to advance to the Quarter Finals of the Champions League but the referee is not the culprit. This was an inside job.

If a member of staff steals from you outside the house, is that still an inside job?

I Am Random!

PS – While we’re all losing sleep over whether it was a sending off or not, Nani and the rest of the losing contingent will still be paid their astronomical wages. While a lot of speculation exists as to what footballers are paid, this should give you some idea. Still care so much about the outcome?

Will his goals bring title number 20?

So why the ‘criminal’ header? Well, I believe a crime has been committed, hence the headline. The main character in this crime is one Robin van Persie, dubbed RVP by fans and sports writers (hence the headline’s use of R.V.P crimes – I really needed to explain that, like, seriously?), the erstwhile Captain of Arsenal Football Club, the former ‘Heroes of Highbury’ and current Emperors of the Emirates.

If you’re still reading and happen to be in the know about football and stuff, you’re probably thinking, “Oh gosh! Not another bitter Arsenal fan here to complain about van Persie joining United?! Get over it and get on with yer life mate!”

On the contrary, I am a supporter of Manchester United, the United in question. What is being reported as Manchester United purchasing Robin van Persie from Arsenal, I see as Robbery (spotting no jewelry in Arsenal’s trophy room, United pilfered their prize possession), Villainy (it’s pure evil, yanking your main rival’s top gun) by United and Polyandry by van Persie (why not polygamy, you ask? Because I think it’s a bitch move!)

So why am I displeased my team just ‘purchased’ the top player in English football from last season? Well, here’s why… before I became a supporter of Manchester United, I had to give a damn about the sport in the first place. Same goes for any sport/pastime where I have support for any team/individual/entity. So, I love football and can watch two amateur women’s teams play as long as they play a good game. However, being a free spirit in such things, as odd as it may sound, doesn’t come naturally (Read that last statement again and please tell me I’m not crazy). You just have to support a person, squad or ideal. While you can prefer football to tennis, you can’t really ‘support’ football, can you? Yes, you can be neutral but when it reaches a certain level of passion, you find yourself moving towards one side – the conqueror, the underdog, the best looking, the quickest, whatever – and it just sticks. Eric Cantona & Peter Schmeichel drew me to Manchester United and I’ve been a believer ever since. However, I can still watch Arsenal, Liverpool, Newcastle, Getafe, Columbus Crew, Swaziland or even Igbobi Boys play football any day, as long as a quality match is on display and root for whoever. Even when United is playing, I applaud good moves by their opponents and sometimes pray they give us the kick in the pants we deserve for such a shite display. I appreciate football that much.

So what’s my problem with RVP? I feel like he sullied the sport for me a little. He was the Captain of Arsenal FC, the last of a golden era of Gunners football and he joined their biggest rivals in the quest for glory (individual over collective, regardless of what anyone tries to tell you). Forget what United’s cross-town rivals Manchester City did last season; forget the Mourinho years at Chelsea and the red card fiestas against Liverpool; Arsenal FC still remains United’s biggest rivals. So after years of going to battle and kissing the canon that adorns the Arsenal badge as he unleashed shot after shot at the Red Devils, RVP will now dress up in the colors and logo of Mighty Manchester. It just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. One of the greatest things about football is the rivalries. This transfer dishonors one of its greatest.

Warriors of Old – Manchester United’s Roy Keane and Arsenal’s Patrick Vieira share some love

I love basketball more than I love football. And I really LOVE football. So if you know anything about the NBA, its most storied rivalry features the Boston Celtics (the team I support) and the Los Angeles Lakers. The star of the Lakers is Kobe Bryant who is arguably the greatest player of his generation (Tim Duncan is the only one in the same class) and probably one of the 10 greatest (on record) to ever play the game. With Kobe, you love him or hate him, there’s no in-between. Earlier in his career, I absolutely hated Kobe Bryant. I laughed like a villain when my Celtics humiliated him and his Lakers to win the 2008 NBA Championship and cursed him out when his Lakers triumphed over the Celtics two years later.

However, I always respected the man and his talents, actually stating repeatedly that he is, in my opinion, more naturally gifted than one Michael Jeffery Jordan (DO NOT IN ANY WAY take this to mean I’m saying Kobe Bryant is better than Michael Jordan! There are at least five – possibly more – players Kobe has to surpass to even enter Jordan’s rarefied airspace). Today, there’s no love or (real) hate for Kobe, just the respect and appreciation of how he plays the game I love so much, but he plays for the other guys, so I have some apathy towards him 🙂

Anyway, what I’m getting at is this – as much as I respect Kobe Bryant’s abilities, I DO NOT want to see him play for the Boston Celtics! EVER! That would be traumatic and wrong on too many levels. The Celtics are falling behind in the Championship race, so having Kobe will seriously boost our chances BUT IT’S KOBE BRYANT!!!

This is how I feel about Robin Van Persie suiting up for the Red Devils of Manchester. He is a player I have long admired and appreciated. I saw him as the second coming of one of my favorite players ever, himself an Arsenal legend and fellow Dutchman, Dennis Bergkamp. I told many people that the oft-injured van Persie would be devastating to opponents if he just stayed healthy and in his first injury free season? He was the best player in the entire league. Journalists and his peers were in agreement. If he continues to stay healthy and gels with Wayne Rooney and the rest of the squad, I will be front and center screaming, “Get in ye Reds!” while watching them perform but still, I would rather do so without van Persie. For me, it’s like Rooney signing for Chelsea or Leo Messi for Real Madrid… In the powerful words of the Mad Rapper, “Nah san, nah!”

Now, here’s the most interesting bit about my rant and the sentiments of ‘betrayed’ Arsenal fans: WHO CARES WHAT YOU THINK?

The man is rumored to be receiving about £200K per week and would also have collected about £2.25m on his transfer fee. I’m still contemplating whether I should buy credit or petrol.

Robin van Persie will suit up tonight in United’s season opener against Everton, wearing #20, which belonged to one of my favorite Reds ever, the Baby Faced Assassin, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer. I will sit down, I will watch, i will ooh and ah (sadly, with no Cantona) as RVP has a riveting, vile or par debut for Man U. I will get over it. I’d better get over it because if I don’t, trust that not a brass farthing out of that £2.25m or weekly £200K will go towards the purchase of the panadol for this self inflicted headache.

I’m just a sports fan. Irrationally passionate and unnecessarily vocal. I would have been more untrue to myself if I hadn’t spewed this putrid venom than I have accused van Persie of being to Arsenal, it’s fans and the purity of football and its rivalries.

So in closing, begrudgingly but excitedly, I accept Robin van Persie (yeah, like it’s my place to do so) into the United fold and look forward to his first dance amongst the Red Devils of Manchester later tonight.

Arsenal fans, may your pain be our gain and come May 2013, may your pain be our champagne!

What? It’s still a rivalry, ya goonies! I don’t feel sorry for ya!

PLAY BALL!

Glory, glory Man United!

NOTE: There will be foul language used in this post to drive home some points. Yes, it could have been written without the cuss words but then, it would defeat the purpose. If you’re fine with that, read on, otherwise, look forward to some nice, wholesome, likely irrelevant, definitely random, posts to follow soon. Oh, and this post is rather long, too and all over the place. Smile.

You know how we take things for granted just because they’re always there? Like a chair, for example. You just know it’s there and you park your butt in it, not giving a second thought to its existence; like how it got there. You know, was it once a tree that bore beautifully delicious fruit? Was it a cow mothering playful calves (no, not ‘yams’ as in calf muscles but baby cows, where one is a calf. Don’t get it twisted now. You probably took THAT for granted too! Digression in the first paragraph? *sigh*) before being reincarnated as a Lay-Z-Boy without prior consultation or negotiation? At this point, you’re probably thinking – why do I care or where is Johnny Random going with this? (Would you be surprised, one bit, if I said I didn’t know myself?)

Well, here’s where I’m going. Since the 1980s (80s baby, holla!), well, 1990s in Nigeria, cable television has become a fabric of basic human existence. You just had to have cable television, otherwise, what would you watch? VideoMart, VideoNet & Mega Movies (all video rental clubs, for the uninitiated) could not provide on-demand entertainment. So the rise of MFP, ABG and all other pretenders (be it transmitted via satellite dish or rooftop antenna) was imminent and welcome. However, as the years advanced, a powerhouse rose to monopolize the cable game – DStv, promising ‘so much more.’

Most subscribers incessantly curse DStv for offering limited channels, even though they offer over 250 (or is that 350?) but they go bonkers when the ‘limited’ service is unavailable. For a man of simple tastes and such easy virtue (read that statement however you like, heck, I don’t even know why I wrote it), as long as I can watch the NBA, Around the Horn, PTI and SportsCenter on ESPN and catch the Barclays Premier League on SuperSport, I’m good. Any channel that airs classic sitcoms and movies (okay, and corny T-movie classics like Mega Piranha get airtime too – T-movie: since movies are classified as A or B movies, these programs are too terrible to rank high on the movies’ alphabetical rate scale. And being terrifically terrible, trivial and thrilling, these tearjerkers [from laughing so hard at the unintentional comedy, not from the highly emotional nature of these moving pictures] totally take on a T rating) as well get a look in from me.

Anyway, this isn’t about what or why I watch, neither is it about people’s complaints on viewing limitations. However, if you live in Nigeria, in a major city, chances are you have DStv at home, work or your local beer parlor. The monopoly is real (hitv turned bye-tv real quick) and it is part of your life – DStv is just there!

So here’s what it is – for years, I never thought about what the D and S in DStv stood for. All I knew was that I had DStv and there it was. It was never a big deal because it had become part of life, something that was just there because it was meant to be:

“What’s that?”

“It’s DStv!”

“Oh, ok. Pass the salt, please.”

However, the random generators kicked in one day while watching an old movie, I forget which, and I realized that the D stood for DON’T and the S for SWEAR! DStv is DON’T SWEAR TV! Anybody know what I’m talking about? Well, whether you do or don’t, lemme get into it.

Watching a movie on DStv, do you realize that cuss words are muted? For example, let’s say an angry character goes off, what you’re likely to hear is, “What the ____ would you do if you were me?” or maybe, “Could you please stop?! I don’t need this ____ right now!”

You might sit there thinking, “So why exactly is he complaining; isn’t censorship a good thing? Kids might be watching!” Well, I have two major issues with it:

One. It disrupts the natural flow of the movie/story and just pisses me the hell off.

Two. What then, is the point of their parental guidance feature and the little animation in the top right corner that tells you the age rating of the program and whether it contains N(udity), V(iolence), S(ex) or L(anguage)?

Surely, if the L is highlighted, we know there’s going to be F bombs dropped in there. Yes, I know we cannot control what our children watch all the time but there’s also the parental control function, however, most won’t even bother learning how to activate it, it is, after all, ‘such a hassle.’

Anyway, my issue is not with subscribers but the service provider. You chose to air a movie you advertised to me, the viewer, and then show me an altered version of the movie. What’s that about?

One. Why show it at all, then?

Two. Why bother with Parental Guidance, then, if you’ve gone in to alter already?

It beats and bugs me for real.

However, beyond the colorful ‘fucks,’ ‘bitches’ and ‘shits’ that get no airplay on DStv, the words ___ and _____ are not allowed either for some reason. Why are you confused? Oh, you don’t know what words those are? Well, maybe I don’t either because DON’T SAY TV won’t let the words come out of the characters mouths!!!

Anyway, the words are God and Jesus. I haven’t realized nor paid enough attention to ascertain whether Allah, Buddha and other religious figures receive the same treatment. Homeland is on DStv now, so I may try to catch an episode and keep watch. So, if a guy is trying to plead for his life onscreen, you’re likely to hear:

“Please, for the love of ___, don’t kill me!”

Or how about the startled young lady that didn’t notice her lover sneaking up behind her?

“Oh _____, you scared the ____ out of me!”

I would sure love to watch The Passion of the Christ on DStv. Don’t know how I only just thought of this. However, it seems the censorship is limited to MNet Channels as TBN for example would be something to watch with a ban on ___ and _____, no? I mean, they’d have to blur the name on the screens as well, no? Like the works of the LORD (I believe you’re allowed to say LORD but I may be wrong, thinking someone meant to say ___ when they actually said LORD), the reasoning behind the censorship is a mystery.

So, thinking it was a choice between DON’T SWEAR and DON’T SAY, I learned there was yet another DS while watching Higher Learning on DStv one day. (Oh wow, I just realized that my mind went to work while watching a movie about higher learning – what, you didn’t get that from the title? – so I’m not a total doofus :D) In case you’re unfamiliar with this John Singleton movie or just can’t remember, it focuses primarily on racial tension and self discovery as the transition is made from boys to men and girls to women.

(Possible SPOILER Alert but the movie is about 17 years old)

A pivotal scene in the movie depicts the rape (or attempted, depending on how you look at it) of a female student by a male student (while that might seem the obvious sequence, you’d be shocked), both white. The girl’s roommate is black and she is called a bitch (at least, I believe that’s what he called her, as DStv was sure to hit me with a _____) by the white guy when he calls the room to talk to his victim. You know the sistahs don’t play that, so she calls her black buddies and they are more than willing to mobilize and head over to the guy’s dorm, where an all-white party is in full swing and deliver a can of whupp ass!

Here’s the thing, the rape scene was filmed but it wasn’t anything disturbingly graphic like Monica Bellucci’s rape scene in the disturbing yet brilliant Irreversible. The couple, a bit tipsy, was actually getting along and fooling around. She was willing to have sex with him but her issue was his refusal to wear a condom. He kept going, convincing her it was ok and she started trying to fight him off but he was already inside her. The scene depicts her struggle, fear and anger as she tries to fight him off of her. It goes on for a while before she successfully shoves him away and frantically scrambles out of the room.

Why speak about this scene? Because on DStv, it quickly cuts from them on the bed, her saying no and then to her scrambling away and out. So, having never watched the film, you may think nothing happened because she was able to hustle away from the situation before it went far but he had actually penetrated her and was having unprotected intercourse with her, much to her dismay. I can understand that rape is a very sensitive and touchy subject and they felt some responsibility to downplay it but it is a part of the movie, a pivotal one at that, which you’ve decided to air and again, you have your Parental Guidance ratings in play. Also, the movie was airing after midnight.

So in essence, DStv is also DON’T SEX TV!

In the movie Sex and the City 2, Charlotte has a well-endowed nanny that is averse to wearing bras. During a scene where she’s bathing one of the kids and has a vest on, the kid sprays her with the shower head and of course, it’s wet top city. DStv didn’t show the result of the spray. A Samantha sex scene is also omitted. It has Sex in the title but hey, what do I know?

The premise of Hall Pass has two wives giving their perverted husbands ‘hall passes’ which gives them a week off from marriage to do whatever they want to do. One wife gives her husband one but the other refuses to give her husband the ‘privilege.’ The scene features him going up the stairs behind his wife and when she says there will be no nookie for him that night, he says he forgot to take out the trash and the next scene has him being handed over to his wife by the police with nosy neighbors looking on but DStv would rather have one imagine why he got arrested. The reason is alluded to but can easily be missed. It turns out ‘taking out the trash’ turned into him masturbating in his car and being caught by the police. It was just his chest to head in the shot but his trembling arm and facial contortions pretty much gave it away but I guess DStv would rather have you guess why he got arrested.

Anyway, I have broken it down to DON’T SWEAR, DON’T SAY and DON’T SEX but DON’T SWEAR is the top contender and the reason I say this? I once watched The Original Kings of Comedy on DStv…

Now pause for a minute and let that sink in… The… Original… Kings… of… Comedy… on… DON’T… SWEAR… T… V! Yes.

In case you haven’t seen it or you don’t remember (I seriously doubt either applies to anyone reading this blog), the show closed with the late Bernie Mac breaking down the word, ‘motherfucker’ to the audience. He described it as a noun because “it describes a person, place or thing,” which is why black people use it so much.

Watch the video here and either refresh your memory or witness comic genius at its finest.

So, in closing (finally! yes, even I am tired), I have this to say:

Can someone tell _____________ DStv that they ain’t gotta censor every _____________ program they _____________ air because that _____________ ____ be pissing _____________ the ____ off. Trying to watch a _____________ classic ____________ of a movie and these _____________ here have to go edit out all the _____________ cuss words. What typa _____________ ____ is that? I mean, really, who _____________ does that? So, listen to me clearly you _____________ DStv operators. I pay my _____________ subscription every month, to watch some _____________ quality television and you _____________ keep _______ with the _____________ broadcast, pissing off a ____________! Just _____________ stop and show the _____________ movie the way it was meant to be _____________ shown and stop trying to be some _____________ holier than thou _____. If you keep pulling this _____________ ____, I swear to ___, one of these days, I’mma come on down to your _____________ office and whoop the ____ out of some _____________ ___, comprende?

And I’m out this ____________!

Yes, I really just made you read through 2000+ words of drivel.

I Am Random!

If the clutches of death had not snatched him in April of 2010, talented rapper Dagrin would be celebrating his 24th birthday today. After a ghastly car crash on April 14, 2010, he sadly passed away eight days later after leaving a huge impact on his peers and fans alike, in his short time as an MC.

I was a huge fan and having met him only once, I was still really stung by his death. I still feel sad whenever I think of him because the sky was his limit but Lord knows best. I can’t help but wonder how things would be if he were still alive today. Would the life – fast cars, loose women etc – have gotten the better of him? Would he have gotten too comfortable to spit his gritty street ditties? Would he have cracked Africa, or even the world at large? All these questions will remain unanswered, at least in this lifetime, but his immense potential cannot be denied.

I remember in 2009 after he had wowed Storm 360 CEO Obi Asika on General PYPE’s “Champion (Remix)”, Mr. Asika spoke about plans to get the Chief Executive Omoita on the BET Hip-Hop Awards Cypher. At the 2011 edition of the Award Show, male and female rappers from Nigeria had Cyphers included in the event. Unfortunately, Dagrin wasn’t one of them. As they say in Hip-Hop, he would have totally killed it! Instead, it was complications from a car crash that killed him.

I remember being stuck in New Jersey while volcanic ash from Iceland destabilized air travel when I got the sad news. I instinctively pulled out my laptop and eulogized him. That article expresses what I felt and what I still feel. May his soul continue to rest in peace.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY BOSS!

BONUS MATERIAL:

Dagrin Album Review

Dagrin Interview

“If I Die”

 

 

Why do the good die young?

I Am Random!